Suicide prevention as social change: From crisis to global impact
Suicide prevention as social change: From crisis to global impact
by George Cassidy Payne
1214 words
A six-circle framework for saving lives, strengthening communities, and shaping a healthier world
How Suicide Prevention Can Become a Practice of Social Change
At 11:30 on a Monday morning, police were called to a public arts high school in Rochester, New York, after reports of a suicidal student. Before officers arrived, a 15-year-old girl fell from an elevated position. She was rushed to the hospital and died later that night.
By afternoon, familiar responses were already in motion: statements of condolence, crisis teams deployed, reminders that the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is available 24/7. All of it mattered. None of it was enough.
For those of us in suicide prevention, moments like this expose a painful truth: our systems are better at reacting to suicide than preventing it. We respond after tragedy, not before. In doing so, we risk framing suicide solely as an individual failure rather than as a predictable outcome of layered psychological, social, and structural risk factors.
Every year in the United States, more than 49,000 people die by suicide, and rates have risen substantially over the past two decades. Suicide remains one of the leading causes of death for adolescents and young adults (cdc.gov).
Suicide is rarely only about individual psychopathology. Trauma, untreated mental illness, social isolation, economic precarity, discrimination, family instability, and systems that fail to respond until it is too late all shape risk. At the same time, biological, neurodevelopmental, and psychiatric factors remain central in many cases, and effective prevention requires attending to both personal and systemic determinants.
As suicide researcher Edwin S. Shneidman observed, “Suicide is a frustrated, confused, tortuous, and torturing desire to die. When someone dies by suicide, it is never merely an act of a moment but the culmination of long and complex psychological pain.”
Reframing Suicide Prevention as Ethical and Systemic Practice
During my work as a 988 Suicide & Crisis Counselor, a colleague once asked whether suicide prevention, while saving lives, actually changed systems. That question lingered—and eventually flipped.
What if suicide prevention is inherently a form of social justice work, one that has simply gone unnamed?
Suicide disproportionately affects those already marginalized: youth navigating instability, individuals facing economic precarity, survivors of violence and trauma, LGBTQ+ populations, immigrants, and people with disabilities whose distress has been minimized or ignored. Every life lost reflects not just personal despair but collective neglect. Every life saved can be an ethical intervention into structural inequity.
Out of this reframing, and in collaboration with my supervisor Andrew Conley, emerged the Conley-Payne Concentric Model of Suicide Prevention. It conceptualizes prevention as layered and expanding, from immediate intervention to long-term community transformation. While the model is emerging and requires evaluation, it provides a practical framework to guide clinicians and organizations.
Circle 1: Immediate Crisis Intervention
At the center is immediate crisis intervention, the moment when someone is actively at risk. The goal is to preserve life while respecting autonomy.
The 988 Lifeline engages callers through active listening, collaborative risk assessment, and stabilization. Counselors clarify the person’s story, reduce isolation, and develop safety plans that maintain dignity and agency. Evidence shows that crisis lines improve caller safety, engagement, and perceived support in the moment, though follow-up is essential.
Circle 2: Short-Term Safety Planning
The 24 to 48 hours after acute risk are among the most dangerous. Short-term planning focuses on continuity: identifying coping strategies, restricting access to lethal means, and reconnecting individuals with supportive people and services. Coordination with families, schools, and community systems is essential, particularly for youth.
Implementation tools include:
· Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) protocols, shown to reduce short-term risk
· Daily check-ins via phone, text, or telehealth
· Connection to outpatient mental health, housing support, and community resources
Circle 3: Long-Term Resilience and Care
Sustained prevention requires attention to mental health care and social well-being. Access to therapy, trauma-informed care, stable housing, educational support, and culturally responsive services builds lives worth staying for.
Evidence-based therapies include:
· Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicide Prevention (CBT-SP), which targets suicidal thoughts and behaviors
· Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), effective for emotional dysregulation and self-harm
Integrated case management connecting mental health care, social services, and community supports
Research on cost-effectiveness continues, though DBT has demonstrated value by common health economics standards.
Circle 4: Community Ripple Effect
Survivors often become peer supporters, advocates, and leaders. Their lived experience carries credibility no clinical manual can replicate, generating a multiplier effect of hope and healing. Suicide prevention thus moves from individual intervention to collective transformation.
As Dr. Patrick McGorry emphasizes, “The best outcomes come when we act early, act collaboratively, and act comprehensively.”
Circle 5: National Impact and Societal Responsibility
Beyond individual, family, and community spheres lies the national circle. Suicide carries profound financial and social costs. Researchers estimate that suicide and nonfatal self-harm together impose an economic burden of approximately $510 billion annually in the United States, largely due to years of life lost, medical spending, and lost productivity.
Each death disrupts workplaces, schools, and neighborhoods, leaving communities with emotional and material losses. Families absorb costs in grief, caregiving, and lost income, while businesses and institutions face indirect costs like absenteeism and decreased productivity.
The ripple effects extend across generations. Children and adolescents exposed to suicide within families or communities are at increased risk for trauma, mental health challenges, and future suicidal behavior. Preventing suicide is therefore an investment in the mental health, stability, and economic well-being of future generations.
National strategies—policies that expand mental health access, integrate suicide prevention into schools and workplaces, and fund evidence-based community programs—are measurable investments in economic resilience and social cohesion.
Circle 6: Global Implications and International Responsibility
Suicide’s impact extends beyond national borders. When the United States experiences tens of thousands of preventable deaths annually, the economic, social, and healthcare costs reduce national capacity to contribute to global priorities such as combating infectious disease, alleviating hunger, and supporting poverty reduction programs abroad.
Suicide intersects with national security and global health, as high rates strain healthcare systems, social services, and public health infrastructure, diverting resources that could support international collaboration and humanitarian efforts. Every life lost represents not only a personal and familial tragedy but also a lost opportunity for the United States to strengthen global well-being.
Reducing domestic suicide rates frees resources—financial, institutional, and human—to support global health, education, and economic programs. Prevention at this scale becomes both an ethical imperative and a strategic one: strengthening the nation strengthens the world.
From Reaction to Responsibility
The death of the 15-year-old in Rochester should haunt us—not only because a life was lost but because it reveals how narrowly we still define prevention. Crisis response is necessary but not sufficient. Suicide prevention must be understood as a sustained ethical practice that attends to immediate risk, upstream determinants, systemic inequities, and societal and global capacity.
Clinicians and communities can move upstream by addressing structural barriers, expanding access to evidence-based care, and embedding interventions that integrate social, psychological, and biological dimensions of risk. Every intervention affirms dignity, challenges neglect, and participates in building societies where fewer people feel that disappearing is the only option.
Suicide prevention is not only about saving lives—it is about transforming the systems, communities, nation, and world that shape those lives. When executed thoughtfully, it becomes a practice of social change.
~~~~~
George Cassidy Payne, syndicated by PeaceVoice, is a Rochester-based writer whose work sits at the intersection of politics, ethics, and lived experience. A poet, philosopher, and 988 crisis counselor, he covers issues of democracy, justice, and community resilience.
peacevoice